Investor Due Diligence Technical Review

Turn Technical Risk Into

CTO-level clarity — Independent validation of architecture, scalability, security, team maturity, and AI claims — so you understand technical risk before you invest.

Independent review by a senior engineering leader (CTO/VP Eng background) — translated into business decisions.

WHY SPEAK WITH ME

• 20+ years engineering leadership
• CTO / VP Engineering experience
• Embedded + cloud + AI background
• Systems engineering discipline
• MBA in Engineering Management
• Experience working with investors & boards

SECTION 1 — WHO THIS IS FOR

For Investors Who Won’t Buy Blind

• Angel investors and syndicates
• Venture capital firms
• Family offices
• Corporate development / acquisitions
• Investors assessing AI-heavy claims

SECTION 2 — THE PROBLEM

Pitch Decks Don’t Reveal Engineering Reality

• Hidden technical debt and unscalable architecture
• “AI” claims that don’t survive technical review
• Delivery process too immature to hit milestones
• Security and operational exposure
• Key-person risk (everything in one engineer’s head)
• IP / documentation gaps that impact valuation

SECTION 3 — WHAT YOU GET (Deliverables)

What You Receive

• Executive Technical Risk Memo (plain-English, decision-ready)
• Architecture Soundness & Scalability Assessment
• Engineering Process & Delivery Maturity Review
• Security & Operational Risk Summary
• AI/ML Claim Validation (when applicable)
• Team Capability + Key-Person Dependency Assessment
• Risk Scoring Model (high/med/low with rationale)
• Board/IC Summary Slides (shareable)

SECTION 4 — HOW IT WORKS (Timeline)

Structured Review for Investment Decisions

Heading: Structured Review for Investment Decisions
Kickoff: investment thesis + claims to validate
Review: docs, architecture, code/process evidence (as permitted)
Validate: scalability, security, team, IP/AI claims
Score: risks with severity + probability + mitigation options
Deliver: exec memo + slides + Q&A

Typical timeline: 1–2 weeks (depends on access and responsiveness)

SECTION 5 — FAQ

Q: What if the company won’t share code?

A: We can still assess architecture, process maturity, and claims using artifacts, demos, and interviews — and we’ll label confidence levels clearly.

Q: Do you produce a “yes/no” recommendation?

A: I produce a risk rating and mitigation plan, plus what I’d want resolved before investing.

Q: Can you join an IC meeting?

A: Yes — I can present findings and answer technical questions.

SECTION 6 — NEXT STEPS

Reduce Surprise Risk Before You Wire Funds

Book a call. I’ll outline what we can validate quickly and what artifacts we’ll need.

• 20+ years engineering leadership
• CTO / VP Engineering experience
• Embedded + cloud + AI background
• Systems engineering discipline
• MBA in Engineering Management
• Experience working with investors & boards